Atom editor

Started by round157, August 17, 2021, 23:58:01

Previous topic - Next topic

round157

They are talking about the editor:

https://www.syntaxbomb.com/appgamekit-agk/atom-editor/msg347051913/#msg347051913

The editor looks very nice.  How can sbasic.exe(console version) be used in the Atom editor? Thanks. (Is it possible? How to set?)

(No editor is for sbasic.exe in the current version of SmallBASIC.)

round157


Aurel [banned]

In general i don't like to use one editor for few languages
that simply sucks but according to your experience we need to try.
Editor don't make language better? or maybe ..
(Y)

round157

Quote from: Aurel on August 18, 2021, 19:19:51
In general i don't like to use one editor for few languages
that simply sucks but according to your experience we need to try.
Editor don't make language better? or maybe ..

The Atom editor may not be good? Okay.

Aurel [banned]

#4
may not be good ...may be but that is just promotion of someone else work
editor for 100 lang-s i like a ..hoki on de loki

Chalenge:
Made code editor in Small basic for SmallBasic !!!!!!
(Y)

bplus

Quote from: round157 on August 18, 2021, 23:56:01
Quote from: Aurel on August 18, 2021, 19:19:51
In general i don't like to use one editor for few languages
that simply sucks but according to your experience we need to try.
Editor don't make language better? or maybe ..

The Atom editor may not be good? Okay.

I remember Chris recommending to me the Atom editor years ago.
1 person likes this

Aurel [banned]

atom ,atom ...atomic

wait
is it even possible to make
code editor in Small basic for SmallBasic
...oups ...there is no .exe builder
(Y)

jsalai

#7
Quote from: Aurel on August 21, 2021, 08:33:49
atom ,atom ...atomic

wait
is it even possible to make
code editor in Small basic for SmallBasic
...oups ...there is no .exe builder

No need an .exe for that!
the initial menu, file list, file viewer, file manipulator is written in sb (I know it bcs I participate with a minor change)!
so could be an complete editor too! The "interpreter" (which actually compile) is fast enough!

just needed a kind soul to do that  :)
I'm too old (ignore that Jr Member attribute), and hate any colorations - a rellict from assem. cobol etc times....

and atom, geany, and of course, yours abandoned, are ready :)
I won't belong to any organization that would have people like me as members.
[Groucho Marx]

round157

Quote from: bplus on August 20, 2021, 19:14:51
Quote from: round157 on August 18, 2021, 23:56:01
Quote from: Aurel on August 18, 2021, 19:19:51
In general i don't like to use one editor for few languages
that simply sucks but according to your experience we need to try.
Editor don't make language better? or maybe ..

The Atom editor may not be good? Okay.

I remember Chris recommending to me the Atom editor years ago.

If chrisws writes a detailed guide for using sbasic.exe and the Atom editor, the guide will be very helpful to beginners in using SmallBASIC to learn programming!

Aurel [banned]

you acting like you are bored of boring
(Y)

bplus

Actually Aurel had an editor working for sb way back when sb had a forum.
1 person likes this

Aurel [banned]

Yes i still have it but still open main SB window
for a difference version for qb64 work better opening compiler console ..
do the job ,and then when you click run (after compilation) your program run
standalone.
Unfotunatelly SB is not made on that way ..no mather is it interpreter
heck i even can run my own interpreter with few other editors as well.
(Y)

bplus

#12
Quote from: Aurel on August 22, 2021, 20:33:36
Yes i still have it but still open main SB window
for a difference version for qb64 work better opening compiler console ..
do the job ,and then when you click run (after compilation) your program run
standalone.
Unfotunatelly SB is not made on that way ..no mather is it interpreter
heck i even can run my own interpreter with few other editors as well.

Put sb in the Run Mode (right click menu popup click Editor [ON] to turn it off) now sb will run the program instead of loading it into the editor.
1 person likes this

Aurel [banned]

#13
Yes i kinda remember that
but that option should be built into command line too
bad thing.... both interpreter and editor are pushed into one exe
ahh ..you know that i'm not real sb user
(Y)

chrisws

These are the current command line arguments:

usage: sbasicg [options]... [BAS] [OPTION]
  -h, --help
  -v, --verbose
  -k, --keywords
  -c, --command='<argument>'
  -f, --font='<argument>'
  -r, --run='<argument>'
  -x, --run-live='<argument>'
  -n, --run-n-wait='<argument>'
  -m, --module-path='<argument>'
  -e, --edit='<argument>'
  -d, --debug='<argument>'
  -p, --debugPort='<argument>'