Softpedia doesn't have

[round157]

Hi...Softpedia is a very popular website and I searched for some softwares on Softpedia.

Then I discovered many BASIC languages there.

FreeBASIC
https://www.softpedia.com/get/Programming/Coding-languages-Compilers/FreeBasic.shtml
QB64
https://www.softpedia.com/get/Programming/Coding-languages-Compilers/QB64.shtml
PureBasic
https://www.softpedia.com/get/Programming/Coding-languages-Compilers/PureBasic.shtml
Basic256
https://www.softpedia.com/get/Programming/Coding-languages-Compilers/BASIC-256.shtml
B4J
https://www.softpedia.com/get/Programming/Coding-languages-Compilers/B4J.shtml
AppGameKit
https://www.softpedia.com/get/Programming/SDK-DDK/AppGameKit-IDE.shtml
BlitzPlus
https://www.softpedia.com/get/Programming/Coding-languages-Compilers/BlitzPlus.shtml

I was surprised because BlitzMax(or BlitzMax NG) is not on Softpedia. Cerberus-X is also not on Softpedia. The above languages were reviewed by their reviewers. Maybe Softpedia's reviewers do not notice the existences of BlitzMax and Cerberus-X. Anyway, I hope that they will discover the two languages.

[Aurel]

Softpedia don't publish anything if author do not post a message to Softpedia.

[round157]

Softpedia don't publish anything if author do not post a message to Softpedia.

Oh, I see. 

By the way, I list their user ratings here: 

B4J: 4.6/5 (5 votes)

PureBasic 4.5/5 (142 votes)

FreeBasic 4.3/5 (41 votes)

ThinBasic 4.1/5 (33 votes)

QB64 3.9/5 (74 votes)

Aurel Basic 3.9/5 (44 votes)

DarkBASIC Professional 3.9/5 (10 votes)

Blitz3D 3.9/5 (4 votes)

Just BASIC 3.8/5 (11 votes)

BASIC-256 3.5/5 (21 votes)

IWBasic 3.4/5 (14 votes)

Basic4android 3.3/5 (37 votes)

Xojo 3/5 (48 votes)

Liberty BASIC 3/5 (11 votes)

BBC BASIC 2.4/5 (7 votes)