Most used screen resolution in 2018

Started by Yue, February 07, 2018, 21:50:13

Previous topic - Next topic

TomToad

Well, these are the graphics modes on my laptop
Available graphics modes:
640,480,32,60
640,480,32,40
800,600,32,60
800,600,32,40
1024,768,32,60
1024,768,32,40
1280,720,32,60
1280,720,32,40
1366,768,32,60
1366,768,32,40

You should be ok with supporting 800x600 minimum as I doubt if anything required lower than that unless it is a really old PC.
------------------------------------------------
8 rabbits equals 1 rabbyte.

col

For the main applications that I develop at work I expect a minimum resolution of 1024 x 768 and have had no complaints for the past 4 years.
https://github.com/davecamp

"When you observe the world through social media, you lose your faith in it."

Derron

#17
I would go with 1024*600 - or 720p (which scales down to 1024x600). with 1024x768 you support an old aspect ratio which gets more and more uncommon - but with 768 pixels in vertical you can get problems on hd-ready mobile devices, on old netbooks ... of course you get this with 720p on 1024*600 too, but at least you do not have black bars left and right.

bye
Ron

col

@Derron
I agree with you about the aspect ratio.
In my error I didn't mention that these work applications are just for windowed desktop only. I understand that you all meant game related ( and therefore full-screen resolutions ) and what I didn't mention was that as I've not had complaints from thousands of people using these apps then it kind of infers that they are using desktop resolutions bigger than the app window size.  ;)
https://github.com/davecamp

"When you observe the world through social media, you lose your faith in it."

meems

#19
thx useful info. @col I note that your listing doesn't include 16bit colour depth. Is that right? If so then that's significant for games, as 16bit colour is significantly quicker than 32bit. my desktop pc + monitor goes down to 640x480 8 bit.

Steve Elliott

Quote
as 16bit colour is significantly quicker than 32bit.

No it's not.  Unless you have ancient equipment.  This is 2018.
Win11 64Gb 12th Gen Intel i9 12900K 3.2Ghz Nvidia RTX 3070Ti 8Gb
Win11 16Gb 12th Gen Intel i5 12450H 2Ghz Nvidia RTX 2050 8Gb
Win11  Pro 8Gb Celeron Intel UHD Graphics 600
Win10/Linux Mint 16Gb 4th Gen Intel i5 4570 3.2GHz, Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 2Gb
macOS 32Gb Apple M2Max
pi5 8Gb
Spectrum Next 2Mb

Rick Nasher

QuoteNo it's not.  Unless you have ancient equipment.  This is 2018.
I second that: my laptop is an HP from 2007 with an NVIDIA and aging, but 32bit is faster than 16bit on this oldie, something I was quite surprised about at the time.


_______________________________________
B3D + physics + shaders + X-platform = AGK!
:D ..ALIENBREED *LIVES* (thanks to Qube).. :D
_______________________________________

Pfaber11

I use 1366x768 for my programs . They play fine on my desktop laptop and Android phone .
HP 15s i3 1.2 upto 3.4 ghz 128 gb ssd 16 gb ram 15.6 inch screen. Windows 11 home edition .  2Tb external hard drive dedicated to Linux Mint .
  PureBasic 6 and AppGameKit studio
ASUS Vivo book 15 16gb ram 256gb storage  cpu upto 4.1 ghz